Analysis… How greed fuels the never-ending Niger Delta crisis
Analysis… How greed fuels the never-ending Niger Delta crisis
On November 1, President Muhammadu Buhari met with the Pan Niger
Delta Elders Forum (PANDEF) after several delay and postponements. At
the meeting held at the Presidential Villa, Abuja, the Chief Edwin
Clark led PANDEF, gave the President a shopping list containing 16
conditions that would, in their reckoning, guarantee the largely elusive
peace in the Niger Delta region. However, less than 24 hours
after the meeting, militants in the region struck, blowing up yet again
important oil facilities in the area. The first, claimed by the Movement
for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta, MEND, though it said was
unauthorized, had been followed by attacks from the notorious Niger
Delta Avengers, NDA and the Greenland Justice Mandate.
These
attacks, according to the militants, were carried out to register their
displeasure with the meeting their elders and leaders held with
President Buhari, as the meeting did not address some of their
grievances.
Also, shortly after the meeting, an association of oil
and gas host communities, HOSTCOM, reeled out another set of five
demands from the Federal Government, claiming also that meeting the
conditions would guarantee peace in the region and allow for unfettered
exploration activities and continued exploitation of the environment.
The
different versions of conditions being reeled out by the different
groups showed that the underlying factor in the protracted crisis in the
Niger Delta is about the economics of oil and gas deposits in the
region and not truly about the environment or development. A close
look at the conditions reeled out by PANDEF showed that the ownership
of oil blocks and the award of pipeline security surveillance contracts
topped. Also the conditions given by HOSTCOM have the pipeline
surveillance contract, payment of the 13% derivation fund from the
Federal Account directly to host communities and the payment of the gas
flaring fines to the communities as central.
A quick recap of the
Niger Delta agitations shows that it has produced more of individual
multimillionaires and billionaires than addressing the issues they claim
to fight for, given, that over the years, ordinary people in the creeks
and streets of the Niger Delta seem to be worse off. The militancy in the region seems to have only produced super rich
individuals that have become a reference point in how to make big money
by becoming an agitator, or taking up arms under the guise of fighting
for the sustainable development of the region. The likes of
Mujaheed Asari-Dokubo, Henry Okah, Boyloaf, Emami Ayıri, Government
Ekpemupolo, alias Tompolo and Ateke Tom all made big money and even
became larger than life, commanding respect and attracting enormous
patronage for becoming economic militants instead of the misleading toga
of freedom fighters or resource control champions. Aside the
obvious insincerity of purpose by the militants and Niger Delta elders
and leaders who see the militancy in the area as an avenue to attract
some relevance and patronage, the Nigerian government, its leaders and
patrons have also acted as economic predators over the years.
Government
has acted in ways that suggest that it is more concerned about the
economic benefits that accrue to purse from the region than the plight
of the people there. The current economic crisis in the country
has been blamed largely on the crisis in the Niger Delta, leading to
deployment of soldiers to curb the activities of militants, not because
the government is concerned for the region but to protect oil facilities
and keep the money flowing. Analysts are of the view that if the
crisis in the Niger Delta is to be resolved, government must begin to
engage genuine leaders of the people, understand their core grievances
and take wholehearted steps to address the poverty, underdevelopment and
devastated environment in the region. They contend that
government’s approach to the crisis only provides temporary succor,
creating super rich individuals in the guise of negotiating peace so as
to retrieve its desired black gold.
As it stands, pictures in the
horizon suggest that government is only saving up trouble for a later
date, as it would only lead to another round of crisis when other
agitators come up claiming to be champions of the people, in order to
get their own share of the proverbial national cake.
By Timothy Enietan-Matthews….RipplesNigeria ….without borders, without fears
No comments: